fort monroe

TIE Directors Conference, 12 Jun 01

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

OUTLINE

^ Goals and Objectives
^ Accreditation Trends and Analysis
^ ADRS

^ TATS-C and DL Status
^ RC Pre-SMDR Update
^ TRADOC QA Cell

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

OUTLINE

^ Media Campaign
^ MOS 77F Reclassification Training
S Facilities
^ 350-18 Update
^ TASS Strategic Plan
^ NCOES Update
^ Closing Comments

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

PURPOSE

Present an update on the

status

of The Army School System
and various issues
impacting the
implementation of
The Army School System

O WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES RF filN

FY01 Execution
vs. Objectives

FY 00

Executi

on

FY 00
2 nd Qtr
Execution

FY 01
2 nd Qtr
Executi
on

FY 01

Objectiv

es

FY 02

Objectiv

es

Quota

Utilization

85%

72%

89%

90%

90%

Class Conduct

74%

71%

77%

80%

85%

TATS -C
Compliance

NA

NA

TBD

50%

75%

Title XI Fill

97%

93%

96%

98%

98%

Accreditation

94%

93%

98%

98%

98%

Ammo

Utilization

69%

NA

NA

90%

95%

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGiLL

FY02 Proposed Goals and
Supporting Objectives

• (Goal) Facilitate the improvement of
institutional readiness

- (Objective) Achieve 98% accreditation of all
Reserve Component (RC) school training
battalions

- (Objective) TRADOC Quality Assurance (QA)
Cell to begin accreditation of proponent school
training battalions on 1 Oct 01

- (Objective) Teach 75% of completed TATS
courses

- (Objective) Maintain 98% fill of Title XI soldiers

Q WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM 6

FY02 Proposed Goals and
Supporting Objectives

• (Goal) Finalize the integration of The

Army School System

- (Objective) Develop a plan for the
alignment of

TR 350-18 with TRADOC Transformation

- (Objective) Institutionalize the RC Pre-
SMDR process

- (Objective) Improve TASS awareness

Q WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM ^

FY02 Proposed Goals and
Supporting Objectives

• (Goal) Facilitate the execution of training

- (Objective) Achieve 90% quota utilization

- (Objective) Achieve 85% class conduct rate

- (Objective) Achieve 95% utilization of
TRADOC ammunition

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

8

FY02 Proposed Goals and
Supporting Objectives

• (Goal) Improve the TRADOC Title XI
program

- (Objective) Develop ODCSED TDA
structure to accommodate proposed
Title XI reductions

- (Objective) Develop a program to
measure the effectiveness of the Title XI
training program

- (Objective) Refine TR 350-18 guidance
on use of Title XI personnel

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM ^

FY02 Proposed Goals and
Supporting Objectives

• (Goal) Improve the utilization of

personnel / organizational resources

- (Objective) Develop a training program
for TRADOC Title 1 0 soldiers

- (Objective) Develop a familiarization
program for proponent school RC LNOs

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

1

The Army School System
Trends and Analysis

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

Background

This brief will cover the findings of the
accreditation process from FY 97 - FY 00

Currently there are 136 TASS BNs in the
TASS system

- 133 BNs are accredited

- 1 BN has not been looked at for
accreditation

- 2 BNs are in a probation status

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

1

Accreditation

• The accreditation process revolves
around evaluating the instruction
of courses

• The Accreditation process involves
a checklist with two parts

- Part I- Training Support

- Part II- Conduct of Training

O WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES RF filN

Major Accreditation
Insights Training Support

• Schools not adequately staffed (IAW TDA)
to support training

- 10% of the schools received a no-go in this area

• Students did not meet prerequisites
(CRITICAL)

- 9% of the schools received a no-go in this area

• School did not follow test control
procedures (CRITICAL)

- 9% of the schools received a no-go in this area

O WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES RF filN

Major Accreditation
Insights

Training Support

Schools did not prepare/distribute AERs
IAW references

- 7% of the schools received a no-go in this area

Instructors did not meet qualification or
certification requirements (CRITICAL)

- 6% of the schools received a no-go in this area

Schools do not conduct internal Instructor
eval

- 6% of the schools received a no-go in this area

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

Major Accreditation
Insights

Training Support

• All short comings from previous
accreditations were not corrected
(CRITICAL)

- 6% of the schools received a no-go in
this area

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

1

Major Accreditation
Insights

Conduct of Training

• Unsafe training practices observed
(CRITICAL)

- 6% of the schools received a no-go in this area

• Student enrollment exceeded
Instructor/student ratios and/or
equipment/student ratios (CRITICAL)

- 4% of the schools received a no-go in this area

• Not in compliance with standards of
TSP/Lesson Plans (CRITICAL)

- 4% of the schools received a no-go in this area

1

O WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES BEG1LI

7

na/nR

Major Accreditation
Insights Conduct of
Training

School does not have required equipment
in serviceable condition (CRITICAL)

- 5% of the schools received a no-go in this
area

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

1

Current Accreditation

Cycle

During the 1st and 2nd Quarter FY 01

- Failure to ensure proper test control
procedures (CRITICAL)

• Signing tests out

• Answer key control

• People on orders to manage Test Control
Process

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

1

Overall Assessment

The primary factor that hinders accreditation is the

Chain of Command must
enforce accountability
and responsibility to
ensure accreditation
Success

The lack of leadership interest has profound effects

at all levels

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

2

Leadership Challenges

At Customer Units

- Ensure students have completed Pre-
Execution Checklist

• The intent of this checklist is to ensure
the unit commander certifies that the
soldier meets the requirements to attend
the course

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

Leadership Challenges

At TASS Bns

- Instructor certification process

- Test control procedures

- Compliance with approved POI

- Compliance with safety
requirements/responsibilities

- Equipment meets serviceability standards

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

2

Leadership Challenges

At TIES

- Issue resolution process

- External assessments of Bns in the
window

- Use of Title XI personnel

- Equipment issues

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

Leadership Challenges

At Proponent Schools

- Standardization of Accreditation
principles

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

2

Leadership Challenges

At DCSED

- Enforce three-year accreditation
cycle to manage funds more
effectively

- Resolve policy issues

- Enforce policy

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

Summary

Maintain standards

Accreditation status is highest ever with
133 of 136 TASS Bns accredited

Accreditation is not just a three-year
cycle; It's everyday!

We must have LEADERSHIP influence

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

ADRS
FY 01-05

• No unresolved Phase 1 problems at this time

• Phase 2 announced in ARNG Command Plan

• Requirements have been identified in 03-07 POM

• Phase 2 effects Regions A, C, and E

• Majority of requirements are in the following
MOS':

- 88M - 3732 req, 54%

- 54B - 603 req, 9%

- 52D - 382 req, 6%

- 77F - 332 req, 5%

- 95B - 200 req, 3%

- 92A - 180 req, 3%

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

2

nQ/nR

7

ARMY DIVISION REDESIGN
STUDY (APRS) TRAINING

- Phase I FY 00-05

- Approx. 6,500 Soldiers to train (on track)

- 11 MOSs Comprise 86% of Reclass Requirement

- Phase II FY 01-07

- Approx. 8,000 Soldiers to train

- 14 MOSs Comprise 81% of Reclass Requirements

- Phase III & IV

- Dependent on Army Transformation Initiatives

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

2

CURRENT TRADOC POSITION
ON PROPOSED
TITLE XI POSITION
REDUCTIONS

TRADOC HAS SUBMITTED A RECLAMA VIA
FORSCOM TO CSA REQUESTING RETENTION
OF ALL 101 PROPONENT SCHOOL TITLE XI

POSITIONS

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

2

TRADOC Title XI Program

TIE (32)
legional Coordination
Resource Manageme
Ammo Management
Quality Control

/HR

415 - Title XI
Soldiers

. O WHERE TOMORROW'S Vl<9<7i^&

TRADOC Title XI Program
toposed Redu<

Total
proposed
reductions arei!4
out of 415,
a 35% reduction

(J WHERE TOMORROWS VICTORIES BE GILL

HQ/HR

Impact of Proposed Title XI
Reductions to TRADOC

Loss of Title XI positions at the proponent school negate proponent
school's accreditation visits to TASS Training

Eliminates future support to TRADOC Quality Assurance (QA) Cells

Adversely impacts TRADOC ability to manage ADRS
implementation

Reduces TRADOC's AC/RC integration efforts

Ability to act as TRADOC Executive Agent for implementation and
execution of TASS will be degraded

Resulting degradation of TASS will reduce the Army's ability to
achieve and maintain 85% DMOSQ.

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

3

Training Development

Issues

• DCSED is sending a request for assistance to the DCST

• Focusing on training development issues that impede
training execution

• Issues are TATS course lengths, management of errata
sheets, course implementation dates, and integration of
distance learning modules

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

3

TATS -Courseware
Implementation

As of 15 MAY 01

Total

Courses

to

Convert

Analysis

/Redesign

Complete<

Course

Development

ICompleted

(Commandan

Approved)

TATS-C POIs
Approved by
NGB /USARC /
tTRADOC
(TOMA)

Ready to
Teach -
RTT

(Teach in
12-18
Months)

418

416

397

318

315

GOAL:

89% COMPLETE BY 4TH QTR, FY01
99% COMPLETE BY 4TH QTR, FY02

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN ”

TATS Course Development

Process

* 5 year planning and execution timeline

* Individual Training Plan (ITP) is developed and
verified with

Course Administrative Data (CAD) for each new course

* Proposed course structure is sent to USARC/NGB for
approval

* Proponent approved POI sent to TRADOC for
approval

* Course distributed for validation and loaded on
ATRRS

* POI loaded on Reimer Digital Library for electronic

diStribu ftQH FRF tomorrows victories rf kim

The Army Distance Learning Plan
(TADLP) Execution Goals

• TADLP Goals :

* 525 Courses slated for redesign to DL by
FY2010

•Sharable Courseware Object Reference
Model (SCORM) compliant

* 850 TADLP & Digital Training Technology
Program (DTTP) DTFs planned for 95%
coverage of the Army (AC & RC)

•Full Interconnectivity & Capability

3

Deployed Training & Real Time Simulations
unde ^

RIES BEGIN I

Execution of the Plan to Date

Courseware:

* 92 DL modules currently on
ATRRS

* 101 Program courses funded

* 11 Completed unit DL products

* 21 Courses finished

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

3

RC Pre-SMDR Process
Update

□ Consolidated Working Training
Requirements Arbitration Panel / Regional
Training Coordination Conference
(CWTRAP/RTCC)

>A11 seven TASS regions conducted CWTRAP/RTCC
between 23 APR - 18 MAY 2001

> 21 MAY 2001 ODCSED conducted
CWTRAP/RTCC AAR with participants from NGB,
USARC and DCST (TOMA)

> Bottom Line: the concept of consolidating the
WTRAP and RTCC is valid. The consolidation
saves 5-7 days of TDY expense per participant and
begins to maximize the efficiencies within the
Training Management Life Cycle

' O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM 3

RC Pre-SMDR Process
Update

□Trends across all Regions: need to
increase the level of participant
preparedness, training, and
understanding of the Training
Management Life Cycle

> ODCSED continues working with NGB and
USARC to develop policy and a training
strategy that addresses identified shortcoming.
ODCSED objective is to institutionalize the RC
Pre-SMDR process.

O

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEG1LI I P

rre-aMDK Process
Update

□ National Training Coordination
Conference (NTCC), 16-20 JUL 2001,
Reno, NV

>NTCC being modified as a ODCSED hosted
forum for short-range training coordination
and long-range training planning

>NGB's Institutional Training Workshop (ITW)
and USARC's Institutional Training Support
Workshop (ITSW) merge together in the short
range portion of the NTCC

> Full incorporation of the ITSW is scheduled
for FY02 due to earlier execution and fiscal

cons traints, — S VICTORIES BEG1LL ^

K(J rre-aMDK Process
Update

> Required SMDR work of the NTCC is conducted
within proponent breakouts

> TIE Involvement: provide representation for
information collection and collaboration; May be
required to provide equipment i.e. projection
systems

> Conference information on TASS website; Agenda
and issue papers will be posted NLT 19 JUN 2001

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

4

TITLE XI PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT

Annual Requirement due DCSED 1
DECEMBER, report thru 30 September
Conduct and assessment of the effectiveness
of the program within AOR
Note improvements in the training of
supported units

Overall impact on accreditation

Include results of Housing Survey and
quality of life trends

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

TRADOC Quality Assurance

Program

[ > Phase 1 (Oct 2001) : CG, TRADOC-directed
Transformation Initiative to begin accreditation of TRADOC
proponent schools

^ Focus on POIs, personnel (faculty), and infrastructure

^ CAC accredits Leader Development; Accessions
Command, IET

^ Include military and civilian educators on accreditation
teams

^ Not just inspections; teams will provide staff assistance

^ Will apply to both branch schools and TASS Training
Battalions .

; Q WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM

n tWrirv : i j i. ta rr i:j i.:

TRADOC Quality Assurance

Program

■=> Phase 2 (Oct 2003) : As TRADOC transforms. Quality
Assurance Offices are embedded in each new

element that stands up

^ HQ TRADOC has oversight, guidance, and policy
responsibility

^ Center-level (CAC, Accessions) continues to accredit
proponents

^ Proponents continue to accredit TASS Battalions

^ DCSED and TXI Program management integrated at HQ
level

^ TIE assets and some TXI personnel integrated at centeii-

. _* O WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES BEG1LI

naTn^ 1 4

The Army School System Media

Campaign

• Annual/Progress Report

Available for distribution 30 July 01

• National Guard Association of the United States
Conference

25-28 Aug 01 - Indianapolis, Indiana

• Association of the United States Army (AUSA)
Conference

6-8 Oct 01 - Washington, D.C.

• Infomercial/E-Card

Available for distribution 30 Sept 01

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

TRADOC Beret Guidance

TRADOC Title XIs will be issued berets when the
host installation issues berets

Each installation's CSM is responsible for training
soldiers on the aspects of wearing the beret

Berets are organizational headgear; soldiers can not
don the beret until the beret has been issued to
them and they have been properly trained

Headgear for visitations/accreditations will be same
as unit being visited

TRADOC HQ will don berets on 14 Jun 01

’ ! O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM E

/r ir

77F RECLASSIFICATION
TRAINING

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

4

BACKGROUND

• The Number of Reserve Component
(RC) students training at Fort Lee
continue to present soldier support
challenges

• All Phase II 77F reclassification training
has historically been done at Ft. Lee

• RC Reclassification training competes
with AIT classes for limited resources at
Ft Lee

Q WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM 4

/r»R* \fn n pw hillpHnn rnn^tnirtinn rlnllar*; 8

FACTS

• 15, 811 Authorized 77F positions (AC, USAR, and
ARNG)

• 8,104 of these positions are in the RC (USAR
7,376, ARNG 728)

• 1,196 (15%) are assigned to RC pipeline units

• An average of 915 RC soldiers per year attend
Phase II 77F reclassification training at Ft. Lee each
summer

• Pipeline Terminal equipment is located at Fort
Lee, Fort Pickett, VA and Sierra Army Depot, CA

• All ntfa6i^«fnqMaentiw<faiiBd 72£. i&class ^

HQ /HR Q

OPTIONS

• Short Term:

• Conduct 77F PHASE II training at locations
other than Ft. Lee where IPDS equipment is
located such as Ft. Pickett and Sierra Army Depot
(Approved by QM school)

• Long Term:

• Conduct both PHASE I and PHASE II 77F
reclassification training regionally

• Implement tracked training for the IPDS
portion of the 77F reclassification POI for the RC

• Train IPDS equipment via computer based
instruction (DCST working)

5
n

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUL

nQ/nR

ADVANTAGES of TRACKED
TRAINING

• Reduces competition for limited resources at Ft
Lee.

• A Reduction of approximately 915 training seats per year
for RC 77F reclassification training

* Tracked training and computer based instruction
will reduce the overall cost of 77F reclassification
training.

• $338,550 is the average cost avoidance for 915 training
seats

(915x2daysx$185per day)

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF GIN

RECOMMENDATION

The Quartermaster School
develop a tracked training POI
for RC 77F Petroleum
Distribution Specialist
reclassification to assist Fort Lee
with support challenges

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

5

TRACKED TRAINING
ADVANTAGES

- Minimizes constraints due to equipment availability

- Efficiency is gained in Phase II (Annual Training) POI
time required (12 days vs. 14 days)

- Allows Phase II reclassification training closer to the
soldier and provides for alternate training locations

- Tracked training will provide the Reserve Components
a cost avoidance of $593,110

- Number of Reserve Component (RC) man days used for
pipeline training in TY00 was 1307(RC) + 296(ARNG)

X 2(days) = 3206 man days (approx, cost is $593,110)

- Number of man days used for Initial Entry (IET)
pipeline training in TY00 was 1970(AC) + 221(RC) +
262(ARNG) * 2(days) = 2453 man days (approx, cost is
$151,963)

- Approximate cost for 5659 man days is $745,073

' O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM

5

3

HQ/riR

CHALLENGES At FORT LEE

Equipment: (pump issues, working, or not working)

- POI issue ref. Tactical Petroleum Terminal
(TPT) equipment availability

- Equipment not always functioning
properly at Fort Lee

- Reclassification students being removed
from equipment to allow AIT students access

Messing: (scheduling and priority issues)

- Reclassification students are moved out of
order to allow AIT students priority

- This has resulted in lost training time and
reclassified soldiers that have not completed
the entire POI

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM EE

Short Term

- Better management of assets

- Place over flow students in safe, quality, off post housing

- Redirect training to sites with available on-post housing

Interim Fixes

- Better prior planning of student loads and available housing

- Use prefab housing on the installation

Long term fixes

- Construct adequate facilities for RC

- POM for MILCON dollars

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

5

TR 350-18 Update

• DCSED staff continues the internal
review process of this regulation

• We expect the closure of the staffs
review NLT 15 June 2001

• Upon completion of the review, DC ST,
TIE'S, US ARC, and NGB will be given
an opportunity for a final review

Q WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES RF filN

TASS Strategic Plan

• Begin "futuring" process to identify TASS Doctrinal,
Training, Leader Development, Organizational, Material,
and Soldier Development (DTLOMS) mission requirements

• Enhance Army readiness through a fully-integrated
educational system

• Focus on identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
and threats to TASS while reviewing goals and objectives

• Must link the TASS Strategic Plan to TRADOC/Army
Transformation from the onset

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

5

nQ/nR

7

NCOES - COMMON CORE

FY00/01

"Crawl"

•Common Core at Propon
School

•TASS Bnscontinue
current operations

PURPOSE:

Bnt *Single standard common core
perscom does scheduling 'Attend close to home station

•Facilitate future changes to NCfO.|gj, portfuture changes

Basic/Advance levels

FY02

"Walk'

•Conduct pilot tests

Ft Lewis - TASS facility
Ft Jackson - TASS facility
USAREUR - DL delivery
USARPAC - TASS facility

•Majority will go to the
proponent for both
phases of training

FY04

"Run"

•Full implementation acrc|>‘
The Army

■/ DL/Resident Mix
s Fully leverage RC TASS

of NCOES

FY03

"Walk"

•Expand to major studer
population areas:

Ft Hood
FtBragg

•Locate TASS structure
near installation or D

•Structured SD concept

WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES BEG1LL

/O R

ft

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

• Leverage and optimize utilization of all
allocatedresources

• Provide Common Core Training for
A/BNCOC to AC soldiers and Regional
USAR/ARNG soldiers

•Provide a flexible, customer based
a pproach, with multiple methods of
delivery oriented to meet the training
need of a given audience

' O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM ~ I

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

• Establish the ability to provide on time,
on demand regional functional training
with Plug and Play capability for the
1SG and the BSNCOC

•Increase Component Awareness by
training all

soldiers to the same standard, in the
same

classroom (A/BNCOC)

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM

USAREUR

Train the soldiers at home station

POI conversion by FT Indian Town Gap

DL Broadcast from the &7th ATC to 6 1
in TEST Concept 2nd Quarter FY-02

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

6

Baumholder

DL Training Sites in
Europe

Hanau

Grafenwohr

When system currently

Wuerzburg
Vicenza

proposed

prototype

proposed

prototypes

SINAI

North

Camp"

South/

Camp

Blu e= Prop osed site

Red - Curr &Atysm tomorrow *

na/OR

tIES BEGIN

6

7 .

USARPAC

* Execute all NCOES courses AT 25ID NCOA until
the HIARNG facilities are completed (joint effort by all
3 compos)

* Program the execution of Phase I Common Core at
the 25th ID NCOA - will not affect IDT courses

* When HIARNG facilities are available , establish Joint
Partnership for the execution of A/BNCOC at the NG
facilities

* The 25th ID will provide facilities and limited support
for the execution of 2 RC PLDC classes

* RC Soldiers will be provided seats in the DL 1SG and
BSNCOC

as required

0 WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGIN

USARPAC 2ND QUARTER
FY02 EXECUTION

PLDC

- 9 AC Classes Per FY/144 students pei

- 2 RC Classes Per FY/144 students pe:

ANCOC/BNCOC

5 BNCOC Classes Per FY/ 36 students

per class

ANCOC Classes Per FY/ 18 students

per class

' I O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM 6

ALASKA PROPOSAL

Considerations:

• Combining AC/RC under one
school

• One standard for all

• Filling seats

• Manning requirements

• Cost effectiveness

= Q WHERE TOMORROW S VICTORIES RF filN

FT JACKSON VISION

Establish an NCOES that
facilitates the training of all 3
components in a True Army
Learning Environment

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES BEGUNL

6

FT JACKSON OBJECTIVES

• Training AC students in BNCOC
& ANCOC common core in FY 01
and beyond

• Train AC students in 1st SGT
course in FY 01 & beyond

• Grow to support future TRADOC
transformation goals

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF filN

FT LEWIS

Currently, two NCOES academies
coexist at Ft Lewis — One AC Academy
under I Corps and one USAR academy
under the 104th DIV-IT.

•Corps Academy is tasked to teach a
30-day PLDC to regional AC/AGR
soldiers from Ft Lewis and Ft Carson.

•104 th NCOA is tasked to deliver
Primary Leadership Development Course
(PLDC) A/BNCOC to Reserve soldiers in
an ADT mode, usually in 14 days.
S4ttdeh# poperlBtiieffl )Ri ec^ —

FT Lewis Proposal

• A fully accredited, integrated
(students/instructor) Regional
NCOES Center of Excellence
providing an efficient and effective
delivery of NCOES

* Establish a new standard
organizational framework that
leverages resources "US ARMY
FORT LEWIS NCO ACADEMY" will
reduc e the allocate d. manpower 6

WHERE WE CAN IMPROV]

• Quota Utilization

• Instructor Certification

• Accreditation of Proponent Schools

• POI/TATS-C

Development/implementation

process

• Enforcement of Pre Execution

Checklist (PEC)

7

/r ir

Title XI Training Program

f J WHERE TOMORROW S VICTEmiES RF dlNr

n

What We Need From You

• Ensure timely submission of
accreditation reports

• Work with TASS community on
getting students to classes

• Responsibilities with MOUs/MOAs -
goal is to have all completed at
beginning of each FY

• Tell TASS story at every opportunity

• Sponsorship program/Title XI
program

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF ^IM

What We Can Do For You

• Provide FY02 guidance

• Centralize and consolidate issues

• Administrative support

• Feedback on issues from SIGACTS

• Monthly point to point VTC or
conference call

• Your recommendations?

O WHERE TOMORROW'S VICTORIES RF flIM

1 .